The system I've created is called the SE2R approach:
- Request resubmission
"You wrote a brief reflection on The Hunger Games, in which you mix plot details and your own personal connection."Explain
"The summary information demonstrates comprehension of plot elements including characterization and conflict -- elements of fiction we recently learned. I think, however, that you misidentify the rising action. I like how you show empathy for Katniss and her plight, as she faces the prospect of killing Peeta (hint: what story element is this?). Elaborating on this part would help."Redirect and Request resubmission
"Please review the presentation on rising action on our classroom web site. Then, revise your reflection, reworking the part on rising action, in order to demonstrate understanding of the concept. Then, elaborate on your feelings about Katniss's tough decision near the end of the story. When you have finished, e-mail me or send me a message on our private message board, telling me that you've done so."What makes the SE2R approach integral to mastery learning is that it removes the kind of subjectivity present in grades and rubrics, while providing students with clear information about what they've accomplished and what they still need to do.
Most important, SE2R allows students to revisit activities and projects, so they can make corrections and resubmit for re-evaluation. This is what teaching and learning should look like.
Are you using anything like SE2R? What advantages and problems do you see in this system of feedback?